User blog comment:SorcererSupreme21/Staff/@comment-131.118.85.15-20180723145440/@comment-27080543-20180724191223

The problem with your statement is not that we can't proof that that is not him. The problem is you can't proof that it is him.

As a random example: If I say there are undetectable inivisble flying babies flying around, YOU can't disprove me but that doesn't make my statement proof that there are those kind of babies.

Untill we have solid 100% proof we can't write it down as fact.